How to Demonstrate Social Value in Tenders & Procurement Bids

Social value is now a standard component of public sector procurement evaluation. Typically weighted at 10-20% of total evaluation criteria, your social value response can be the difference between winning and losing.

Yet many organisations struggle to articulate their social value proposition effectively. They fall into common traps: generic commitments that could apply to any contract, vague statements without supporting evidence, or failure to connect their offer to what the commissioner actually cares about.

Strong social value responses are specific, credible, and aligned. They demonstrate that you understand the commissioner’s priorities, can deliver meaningful impact, and have robust systems to measure and report performance.

 

Understand the brief

Before you write anything, thoroughly understand what’s being asked for.

Study the evaluation criteria

What social value themes are being evaluated? What’s the weighting? Are there specific outcomes or measures the commissioner wants addressed? Understanding the scoring framework helps you structure a response that hits the marks evaluators are looking for.

Research commissioner priorities

Look beyond the tender documents. Review the commissioner’s corporate strategy, social value policy, equality objectives, carbon reduction targets, and local community needs assessments. Understanding broader context helps you align your response with their strategic priorities.

Identify contractual opportunities

Consider the specific contract in question. Where does it create genuine opportunities to deliver social value? A construction contract creates different opportunities than a service contract. A contract in an area of high unemployment creates different opportunities than one in a prosperous region. Your response should reflect the particular circumstances.

Note any constraints

Are there mandatory requirements you must address? Are there specific measures from the National TOMs framework you need to commit to? Are there word or page limits that constrain how much detail you can provide? Understanding constraints helps you prioritise what to include.

 

Structure your response effectively

Lead with commitment

Start with a clear statement of your commitment to social value and why it matters to your organisation. This sets the tone and demonstrates that social value is core to how you work, not an afterthought.

Demonstrate understanding

Show you understand the commissioner’s priorities and the local context, their strategies, acknowledge community needs, and explain how your approach responds to what matters most to them.

Be specific about commitments

Generic statements like “we’ll support local employment” don’t cut it. Quantify your commitments. How many apprenticeships will you create? What proportion of spend will go to local SMEs? How much will you reduce carbon emissions? Specific, measurable commitments are more credible and easier to evaluate.

Explain your approach

Don’t just state what you’ll do—explain how you’ll do it. How will you recruit local apprentices? How will you identify and engage local suppliers? How will you measure carbon reduction? Detail demonstrates you’ve thought implementation through and have a credible plan.

Provide evidence

Back up your commitments with evidence of past performance. Case studies, testimonials, data from previous contracts, and examples of successful social value delivery elsewhere build confidence that you can deliver what you’re promising.

Address measurement and reporting

Explain how you’ll track performance against your commitments and how you’ll report to the commissioner. If they’ve specified particular frameworks like TOMs, confirm your approach aligns. Show you have systems to capture data and demonstrate accountability.

Connect to contract delivery

Make clear how social value integrates with contract delivery rather than being separate. Show how your social value approach enhances your ability to deliver the core contract requirements.

 

Common themes to address

While every procurement is different, several themes appear consistently in social value evaluation:

Employment and skills

Commitments around apprenticeships, work experience placements, jobs for local people or those facing barriers to employment, and training opportunities. Be specific about numbers, duration, and how you’ll recruit and support participants.

Supply chain and local economy

Commitments to spend with local businesses, SMEs, or social enterprises. Explain how you’ll identify potential suppliers, support them to participate, and measure compliance. Show understanding of local business landscape.

Environmental sustainability

Carbon reduction commitments, sustainable materials, waste minimisation, biodiversity enhancement, or contributions to climate adaptation. Quantify where possible and explain your methodology for measurement.

Community engagement and support

Volunteering, support for local initiatives, addressing specific local challenges. Make sure commitments are relevant to the communities affected by the contract.

Fair work and ethical practice

Commitments around real living wage, good working conditions, equality and diversity in your workforce and supply chain, modern slavery prevention.

 

What evaluators are looking for

Understanding the evaluator’s perspective helps you craft stronger responses.

Relevance

Does your response address their priorities? Have you tailored commitments to this specific contract and context, or could this response apply to anything?

Ambition

Are your commitments stretching and meaningful, or are you simply describing business-as-usual? Evaluators can recognise when you’re packaging existing practice as social value.

Credibility

Can you actually deliver what you’re promising? Is there evidence of capability and past performance? Is the implementation approach realistic?

Measurability

Are commitments specific and measurable? Have you explained how you’ll track and report performance?

Added value

What additional benefit does your approach create beyond the baseline? Why should the commissioner choose your social value offer over competitors?

 

Common mistakes to avoid

Generic responses

Boilerplate text that could apply to any tender rarely scores well. Evaluators read multiple bids and can easily spot templated responses.

Vague commitments

“We will support local employment” is meaningless without specifics. How many jobs? For whom? Over what period?

Overpromising

Committing to more than you can realistically deliver damages credibility. It’s better to make fewer, deliverable commitments than impressive-sounding promises you’ll struggle to meet.

Ignoring the brief

If the commissioner has specified particular social value measures or frameworks, your response must address them. Failing to respond to what’s asked for results in low scores regardless of how good your general approach is.

Lack of evidence

Claims without supporting evidence lack credibility. Always back up statements about your capability or approach with concrete examples and data.

Forgetting measurement

Commissioners need assurance you’ll be accountable for delivery. Explain measurement and reporting clearly, don’t leave evaluators wondering how you’ll track performance.

 

Bringing it together

A strong social value tender response tells a coherent story. It demonstrates genuine commitment rooted in your values and culture. It shows you understand what matters to this commissioner and these communities. It makes specific, credible, measurable commitments that respond to contract-specific opportunities. It provides evidence you can deliver. And it explains how you’ll measure, manage, and report performance.

This isn’t about gaming the evaluation criteria. It’s about articulating genuine capability and commitment in ways that help evaluators understand the value you’ll create. Get it right, and social value becomes a genuine competitive advantage rather than just another compliance hurdle.

 

Ready to measure your impact?

Whether you’re looking to strengthen your social value reporting, improve your tender submissions, or simply understand the difference you’re already making, we’re here to help. Get in touch today.

Jamie Hillier

Partner
Contact

With a penchant for tweed and jackets with leather arm patches, Jamie began his career as a quantity surveyor, before climbing the ladder to lead major projects for a Tier 1 contractor.

Eventually expanding his book collection beyond copies of SMM7, Jamie has interest in a broad range of subjects linked to delivering better outcomes for society and the environment.

His strategic insights on MMC and behavioural science have made their way into numerous government, industry and academic publications, including the Construction Playbook, Transforming Infrastructure Performance Roadmap to 2030, the Platform Rulebook and the RIBA DfMA Overlay.

John Handscomb

Partner
Contact

Construction is in John’s blood. Learning from his father who was a planner and project manager, John began his career by working on some iconic projects in both the public and private sector.

As a procurement expert and integrator of new ways of working, John has pioneered the integration of platform principles, DfMA processes and supply chain within over £5bn projects in the last 15 years, for some of the largest building programmes in the UK. Despite his considerable expertise, John keeps it simple, communicating complicated ideas with ease and helping to equip the industry with new knowledge and skills.

Outside of Akerlof, John enjoys his executive role with technology start-up ScanTech Digital, spending time with his family, taking trips down the football, playing a bit of golf with friends and the odd pint. 

Our name is shared with George Akerlof, a Nobel Prize-winning economist.

His seminal paper, Market for Lemons, demonstrated the devastating consequences of making decisions under the conditions of quality uncertainty and unequal information between buyers and sellers, increasing the chance of buyers ending up with a ‘lemon’.

This 50-year-old concept continues to retain parallels within the construction industry.

Through our insight and experience, we can rebalance this information asymmetry on behalf of our clients, levelling the playing field to deliver better outcomes.